Why Don’t We Talk About Race in Fairy Tales?
Characters in fairy tales “are white not by chance, but by design,” Kimberly J. Lau writes in a new book.
by Tamar Boyadjian 
Subscribe to our newsletter
Or Sign in to an existing accountPrivacy Policy
Success! Your account was created and you’re signed in.
Please visit My Account to verify and manage your account.
An account was already registered with this email. Please check your inbox for an authentication link.
Racial beliefs, the book suggests, not only played a crucial role in the emergence of the genre but affected its adaptations and reshaping over time and across different cultures and languages.Depictions of the titular character in Wilhelm Grimm’s editing of the various editions of “The Jew in the Thornbush” grew increasingly antisemitic, from the Jew being “old” in its first appearance in 1815 to having a “long goat’s beard” by 1839, associating the character with evil. In seeing these foundational texts in a new way and interacting with them in manners that go beyond the familiar, Spectersdelivers its promise of shifting our perception both of the genre and our interactions with it, no matter how disconcerting it might be.
A critical factor of untangling the systematic presence of race from the fabrication of these stories is to pay attention to the socio-political contexts in which they developed.The book addresses how European exploration figures into the cultural imaginary of these stories — d’Aulnoy, in fact, was a travel writer. In an early edition of the Green Fairy Book, the only non-European tales included are from China, which was seen as a “civilized” nation in the Victorian era. In later editions, tales are added from Armenian, Aboriginal Australian, and Bantu South African cultures, as well as other places, reflecting missionary and imperial contact. Lau therefore demonstrates how the paradoxical universalization of the European fairy tale — which attempts to collapse and assimilate stories from outside of Western Europe into its own imaginative perspective — mirrors the real-world building of empire. These texts, Lau argues, justify and normalize systems of power and privilege under the expansion of European imperialism. Decolonizing the genre means demonstrating the impossibility of “thinking about the fairy tale without thinking about race.”
Get the latest art news, reviews and opinions from Hyperallergic.
Specters raises a number of important questions around gender politics that lie beyond its intended scope. An integral part of the circulation of these stories was the exchanging of experiences — who told them and where they told them was equally as important as plot. For example, the book alludes to the fascination for retelling folk tales that emerged among Parisian intellectual women in salons during the mid-17th century. Spinnstuben, or spinning rooms, were also spaces where unmarried women gathered in winter months to spin for their dowry or engage in other handcrafts. Spinning is, in fact, a common theme that runs across a number of Grimm’s tales — oftentimes referred to as “spinning tales” — symbolizing women’s aspirations for social productivity and advancement in society. While further studies on the intersection of space, race, and gender could stem from some of the foundational work Spectersputs into place, this bookopens our eyes to the largely unseen but crucial aspect of race in familiar fables, folk tales, and fantasies that have unknowingly influenced us for centuries.
Specters of the Marvelous: Race and Development of the European Fairy Tale(2024) written by Kimberly J. Lau and published by Wayne State University Press is available for purchase online and in bookstores.
We hope you enjoyed this article! Before you keep reading, please consider supporting Hyperallergic’s journalism during a time when independent, critical reporting is increasingly scarce.
Unlike many in the art world, we are not beholden to large corporations or billionaires. Our journalism is funded by readers like you, ensuring integrity and independence in our coverage. We strive to offer trustworthy perspectives on everything from art history to contemporary art. We spotlight artist-led social movements, uncover overlooked stories, and challenge established norms to make art more inclusive and accessible. With your support, we can continue to provide global coverage without the elitism often found in art journalism.
If you can, please join us as a member today.Millions rely on Hyperallergicfor free, reliable information. By becoming a member, you help keep our journalism free, independent, and accessible to all. Thank you for reading.
Become a member